![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
RESEARCH COMMUNICATION
Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract Results and DiscussionMaterials and methodsAcknowledgmentsReferences |
|---|
[Keywords: Cdc7; Drf1; Dbf4; DNA replication; Xenopus; developmental regulation]
Received June 2, 2005; revised version accepted August 3, 2005.
). In the G1 phase, ORC, Cdc6, and Cdt1 cooperate to load the Mcm2-7 complex onto chromatin, resulting in formation of the prereplication complex (pre-RC). The Mcm2-7 complex is believed to be the replicative DNA helicase (for review, see Takahashi et al. 2005). Activation of the Mcm2-7 helicase at the G1/S transition is a crucial step for initiation, which requires multiple factors, including Cdc7 protein kinase as well as Cdc45, a likely helicase cofactor (Pacek and Walter 2004).
Accumulating evidence suggests that a crucial substrate of the Cdc7-kinase is the Mcm2-7 complex. Mcm2, Mcm3, Mcm4, and Mcm6 are in vitro substrates of the Cdc7-kinase in yeast and humans (Lei et al. 1997; Sato et al. 1997; Brown and Kelly 1998; Jiang et al. 1999; Kumagai et al. 1999; Weinreich and Stillman 1999; Masai et al. 2000; Lee et al. 2003). In Xenopus and yeast, phosphorylation of Mcm2 on chromatin during replication is dependent on Cdc7 (Lei et al. 1997; Jares and Blow 2000; Takeda et al. 2001). Finally, in budding yeast, a point mutation in Mcm5 renders Cdc7-Dbf4 dispensable for viability, further pointing to Mcm2-7 as a crucial Cdc7 target (Hardy et al. 1997). However, functionally important Cdc7 phosphorlation sites remain to be identified.
The activity of Cdc7-kinase is regulated by an activator subunit, Dbf4. Cdc7-Dbf4 has therefore been referred to as DDK (Dbf4-dependent kinase) (for review, see Johnston et al. 1999). Recently a Dbf4-related protein, Drf1, was found in humans and Xenopus (Montagnoli et al. 2002; Yanow et al. 2003; Yoshizawa-Sugata et al. 2005), and the question arises as to why vertebrates contain two regulators of Cdc7. In Xenopus, Dbf4 activates the Cdc7-kinase in vitro, and recombinant Cdc7-Dbf4 can stimulate DNA replication when added to Xenopus egg extracts (Jares and Blow 2000; Furukohri et al. 2003; Shechter et al. 2004a). However, attempts to address the role of Dbf4 in DNA replication in egg extracts were confounded by nonspecific inhibition of DNA replication by the Dbf4 antibodies used (Jares et al. 2004). In turn, depletion of Drf1 showed no effect on DNA replication (Yanow et al. 2003). Therefore, the regulatory subunit that accounts for the essential role of Cdc7 (Jares and Blow 2000; Walter 2000) in Xenopus eggs remains elusive. In humans, both Dbf4 (also called ASK) and Drf1 (also called ASKL1) activate Cdc7-kinase in vitro (Jiang et al. 1999; Kumagai et al. 1999; Montagnoli et al. 2002; Yoshizawa-Sugata et al. 2005). In human tissue culture cells, inhibition of Dbf4 via antibody interference blocks DNA replication, whereas inhibition of Drf1 via RNA interference (RNAi) slows S-phase progression (Kumagai et al. 1999; Yoshizawa-Sugata et al. 2005). Collectively, the available data suggest that Dbf4 may have a more important role for the initiation of DNA replication than Drf1, but the precise functions of Dbf4 and Drf1 have not been determined.
In this article, we compared directly the properties of Cdc7-Drf1 and Cdc7-Dbf4 in Xenopus egg extracts and during early Xenopus development. The data support the surprising conclusion that Cdc7-Drf1 plays a far more prominent role than Cdc7-Dbf4 in promoting DNA replication during the early embryonic cell cycles.
|
Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractResults and DiscussionMaterials and methodsAcknowledgmentsReferences |
|---|
We raised antibodies against Xenopus Dbf4 and Drf1 and examined their abundance in egg extracts. Both antibodies recognized phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms of their respective antigen in LSS and NPE (Fig. 1A). Densitometric quantification of Western blots demonstrated that the concentration of Drf1 in LSS is 22 nM, whereas the concentration of Dbf4 is only 1.2 nM (Supplementary Fig. S2A,B). Furthermore, Drf1 is enriched 
12-fold in NPE relative to LSS, whereas Dbf4 is enriched only threefold (Supplementary Fig. S2C). Consistent with this different degree of nuclear enrichment, the concentrations of Drf1 and Dbf4 in NPE were estimated as 260 and 3.6 nM, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S2B). Thus, Drf1 is 18-fold more abundant in LSS and 70-fold more abundant in NPE than Dbf4 (results summarized in Supplementary Table S1).
|
70% of Cdc7 from LSS (Fig. 1B,C, lane 4). Therefore, the majority of Cdc7 is in a complex with Drf1. The data indicate that the concentration of Cdc7-Drf1 and Cdc7-Dbf4 are essentially the same as that of each regulatory subunit, 22 nM and 1.2 nM, respectively. About 30% of Cdc7 remained in the supernatant after Dbf4-Drf1 double depletion, indicating that 30% of Cdc7 (9 nM) binds neither Drf1 nor Dbf4 in LSS (see Fig. 4D, below). We obtained essentially the same results in NPE, except that the ratio was further biased in favor of Cdc7-Drf1 (Supplementary Fig. S3). In summary, Cdc7-Drf1 is by far the predominant form of DDK in Xenopus egg extracts, especially in nuclei, where DNA replication takes place.
Due to its high abundance, we revisited the role of Cdc7-Drf1 in DNA replication. As shown in Figure 2, depletion of Drf1 reduced the initial rate of DNA replication approximately sevenfold compared with the mock depletion. Addition of recombinant Cdc7-Drf1 (rCdc7-Drf1) to the depleted extract at 40 nM final concentration restored replication to nearly control levels (Fig. 2, filled circles), whereas rCdc7-Drf1 did not significantly enhance DNA replication of the mock-depleted extract (Fig. 2, open circles). Furthermore, we found that recombinant Drf1 alone could rescue DNA replication in Drf1-depleted LSS (Supplementary Fig. S4). This result is consistent with data presented in Figure 1, which indicate that a significant fraction of Cdc7 (30% in LSS) is not bound to any known regulatory subunits. Our data show that Cdc7-Drf1 is specifically required for efficient DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts. Previous attempts to functionally deplete Drf1 from LSS (Yanow et al. 2003) were likely unsuccessful due to the high concentration of this protein present in the extract.
Previous results showed that immunodepletion of Cdc7 impairs replication initiation, since origin unwinding, chromatin loading of Cdc45, and Mcm2 phosphorylation are reduced (Jares and Blow 2000; Walter 2000). To determine whether Drf1 is required for replication initiation, we performed an origin unwinding assay in the nucleus-free replication system (Walter and Newport 2000). Thus, when DNA replication is initiated on a circular plasmid in the presence of the DNA polymerase inhibitor aphidicolin, an Mcm2-7-dependent helicase is uncoupled from the replication fork and a highly unwound form of the plasmid called U-form DNA is generated (Pacek and Walter 2004; Shechter et al. 2004b). While mock-depleted HSS and NPE supported hyper-unwinding, extracts depleted of Drf1 did not (Fig. 3A, cf. lanes 3-5 and 9-11). The complete absence of U-form DNA is consistent with the fact that Drf1 depletion completely blocked replication in NPE (data not show). Importantly, rCdc7-Drf1 restored generation of U-form DNA (Fig. 3A, lanes 12-14). These data indicate that Cdc7-Drf1 is required for activation of the replicative DNA helicase.
We next asked whether Cdc7-Drf1 is required for chromatin loading of Cdc45. Compared with the mock-depleted control, Drf1 depletion significantly impaired Cdc45 loading onto sperm chromatin in LSS, and rCdc7-Drf1 reversed the loading defect (Fig. 3B, panel I). Mcm7 and Orc2 served as loading controls (Fig. 3B, panels VIII,IX). These data are consistent with a previous report in which Drf1 depletion caused reduction of Cdc45 loading, even though no inhibition of DNA replication was observed (Yanow et al. 2003).
|
|
). Since purified Cdc7 can phosphorylate yeast and human Mcm4 proteins (Lei et al. 1997; Weinreich and Stillman 1999; Masai et al. 2000; Lee et al. 2003), we speculated that Mcm4 hyperphosphorylation in Xenopus egg extracts is Cdc7-Drf1 dependent. We first confirmed previous results (Pereverzeva et al. 2000) that the slower migrating forms of Mcm4 are due to phosphorylation (Supplementary Fig. S5A, lanes 2,4). Figure 3B shows that the appearance of hyperphosphorylated Mcm4 was greatly reduced by Drf1 depletion, and the effect was reversed by rCdc7-Drf1 (panel II, lanes 5-8). Moreover, addition of rCdc7-Drf1 to the mock-depleted extract enhanced Mcm4 phosphorylation, further suggesting that Cdc7-Drf1 is involved in Mcm4 phosphorylation (Fig. 3B, panel II, lanes 3,4). Finally, we show that Mcm4 phosphorylation correlates closely with Cdc7-Drf1 chromatin loading, and that it immediately precedes Cdc45 recruitment (Supplementary Fig. S5B). The results are consistent with the idea that Cdc7-Drf1-dependent phosphorylation of Mcm4 is an important step in Cdc45 recruitment to chromatin.
As shown previously (Yanow et al. 2003), Drf1 depletion also inhibited chromatin association of Cdc7 (Fig. 3B, panels III,V, lanes 5,6). However, chromatin association of Dbf4 was unaffected by Drf1 depletion, indicating that chromatin binding of Cdc7-Dbf4 is independent of Cdc7-Drf1 (Fig. 3B, panel IV, cf. lanes 1,2 and 5,6). Consistent with this, we detected weak binding of Cdc7 but not Drf1 in a longer exposure of the same membrane (Fig. 3B, panels VI,VII), and this residual Cdc7 binding was Dbf4 dependent, since it was absent in extracts depleted of Drf1 and Dbf4 (data not shown).
We next addressed whether Cdc7-Dbf4 is required for DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts. Our Dbf4 antibodies removed at least 99% of Dbf4 from LSS (Fig. 4A), reducing the Dbf4 concentration to at most 12 pM. However, there was no significant effect on DNA replication (Fig. 4B), Mcm4 phosphorylation (Fig. 4C), or the chromatin loading of Cdc45, Drf1, or Cdc7 (Fig. 4C). Assuming that replication initiation occurs approximately every 10 kb on sperm chromatin (3 x 109 bp), in our experimental conditions (3000 sperm/µL), there are 9 x 108 origins per microliter extract. At a concentration of 12 pM, there is only one Cdc7-Dbf4 complex available for approximately every 125 origins that are normally activated. The effective concentration of Cdc7-Dbf4 is probably even lower, since only 10% of Dbf4 normally localizes to nuclei (see Supplementary Table S1). Since it is unlikely that a single Cdc7-Dbf4 complex could rapidly activate »100 origins, the data suggest that Cdc7-Dbf4 is not normally required for DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts.
To test whether Dbf4 might account for the residual DNA replication observed in Drf1-depleted extracts, we depleted Drf1 and Dbf4 simultaneously and compared replication with Drf1-depleted extracts. Western blotting showed that all detectable Dbf4 and Drf1 were removed by the double depletion (Fig. 4D). As shown above, Drf1 depletion significantly reduced DNA replication (Fig. 4E, filled squares), but codepletion of Dbf4 caused no further decrease (Fig. 4E, filled triangles), suggesting that the residual replication activity seen in Drf1-depleted extracts is not due to Dbf4. It is possible that the remaining DNA replication seen in Drf1/Dbf4-depleted extracts is due to a third Cdc7 regulatory subunit that remains to be identified, or to a low level of Cdc7-independent origin firing. Interestingly, as is the case for Drf1, depletion of Cdc7 resulted in extracts that supported residual DNA replication (data not shown). However, as for Drf1 depletion, we are unable to determine whether this residual replication is due to trace amounts of Cdc7 remaining in the extract, or due to a low level of Cdc7-independent origin firing.
Since Dbf4 depletion had no effect on DNA replication in any context, the question arose whether Xenopus Cdc7-Dbf4 has the capacity to stimulate DNA replication. Previous results showed that addition of Cdc7-Dbf4 to mock-depleted or Cdc7-depleted egg extracts could boost DNA replication (Jares et al. 2004; Shechter et al. 2004a). Consistent with this, Figure 4F shows that the defect in DNA replication caused by Drf1 depletion was completely reversed by recombinant Cdc7-Dbf4 complex. Therefore, while Cdc7-Dbf4 has the ability to promote DNA replication, endogenous Cdc7-Dbf4 in Xenopus egg extracts does not appear to contribute to DNA replication, probably due to its very low concentration, and possibly due to inefficient nuclear transport (Supplementary Table S1) and/or chromatin binding (Fig. 3B).
|
), and in contrast to previous reports (Furukohri et al. 2003; Jares et al. 2004), Dbf4 bound to chromatin in a manner that was pre-RC-dependent (Supplementary Fig. S6). Moreover, like Dbf4 (Jares et al. 2004), Drf1 was essential to recruit Cdc7 to chromatin (Supplementary Fig. S7). Therefore, both Drf1 and Dbf4 not only function as Cdc7 activating proteins, but also recruit Cdc7 to its likely site of action, the pre-RC.
Our data indicate that in Xenopus egg extracts, Cdc7-Drf1 is critical for DNA replication while Cdc7-Dbf4 is dispensable, yet antibody injection experiments suggest that Dbf4 is essential for DNA replication in somatic cells (Kumagai et al. 1999). One way to reconcile these findings would be if the contributions to DNA replication of Drf1 and Dbf4 were developmentally regulated, being inverted between embryonic and somatic cells. To test this possibility, we asked whether levels of Cdc7-Drf1 and Cdc7-Dbf4 change during development.
Upon fertilization, Xenopus eggs undergo 12 rapid, 25-min cell divisions which lack gap phases. Following the 12th division, at a time known as the mid-blastula transition (MBT), the cell cycle is extended and becomes asynchronous, and zygotic transcription starts (Newport and Kirschner 1982a,b). Three divisions after the MBT, at the early-gastrula transition (EGT), maternal mRNAs are degraded and zygotic transcription assumes control of the cell cycle (Newport and Dasso 1989; Howe et al. 1995). As a result, the cell cycle is dramatically expanded and it takes on somatic characteristics.
To examine Cdc7-Drf1 and Cdc7-Dbf4 levels during development, we fertilized eggs in vitro. Embryos were collected at the indicated time points and staged (Nieuwkoop and Faber 1967), and Cdc7 was immunoprecipitated. Cdc7 recovery was similar at all developmental stages (Fig. 5A). Cdc7, Drf1, and Dbf4 were all hypermodified in meiotically arrested eggs (Fig. 5A, lane 1). Intriguingly, Cdc7-associated Drf1 levels began to drop just before the onset of gastrulation (stage 9), when the cell cycle becomes somatic in nature, and they became undetectable at the neurula stage (stage 20). Conversely, levels of Dbf4 associated with Cdc7 gradually went up during the first 12 h of development, and they further increased significantly between 12 and 24 h, during which time all detectable Cdc7-Drf1 disappeared.
For a more quantitative comparison of Cdc7-Dbf4 and Cdc7-Drf1 levels during development, we performed reciprocal IPs using Cdc7, Dbf4, and Drf1 antibodies at stages 3 and 11. As seen above, IP of Cdc7 at stage 3 coprecipitated significant amounts of Drf1 (Fig. 5B, lane 2). Conversely, IP of Drf1 precipitated most of the Cdc7, as seen by comparison with the amount of Cdc7 recovered in the Cdc7-IP (Fig. 5B, cf. lanes 4 and 2). In contrast, IP of Dbf4 precipitated only a small amount of Cdc7 at this stage (Fig. 5B, lane 3). Therefore, Cdc7-Drf1 is still the predominant DDK at stage 3. At stage 11, IP of Cdc7 coprecipitated far less Drf1 and a significantly greater amount of Dbf4 than at stage 3 (Fig. 5B, cf. lanes 6 and 2). Moreover, at this stage, Dbf4 coprecipitated slightly more Cdc7 than did Drf1, indicating that the concentration of Cdc7-Dbf4 is now greater than Cdc7-Drf1 (Fig. 5B, lanes 7,8). Western blotting of the total extracts revealed that the IPs removed the vast majority of each target protein, and that the total level of Drf1 severely decreased, while that of Dbf4 significantly increased between stage 3 and stage 11 (Supplementary Fig. S8). Together, these results argue that the ratio of Cdc7-Drf1 and Cdc7-Dbf4 undergoes a reversal after gastrulation.
In summary, our data indicate that Cdc7-Drf1 plays an essential role in DNA replication in the early embryonic cell cycles. Given the ability of Drf1 to support DNA replication, we propose that DDK stand for "Dbf4- and Drf1-dependent protein kinase." The regulatory subunits of Cdc7 appear to provide at least two functions: activation of Cdc7 kinase and localization of Cdc7 to the pre-RC, where the substrate of Cdc7 presumably resides. Our results identify Mcm4 as an excellent potential substrate for Cdc7-Drf1 during replication in Xenopus egg extracts, since Mcm4 hyperphosphorylation is Cdc7-Drf1 dependent, and it coincides with the chromatin loading of Cdc7-Drf1. Moreover, Mcm4 hyperphosphorylation immediately precedes Cdc45 loading (Supplementary Fig. S5B). Thus, phosphorylation of Mcm4 by Cdc7-Drf1 could explain the requirement for Cdc7-Drf1 in Cdc45 loading. A rigorous test of this model must await identification and mutation of Cdc7-Drf1 phosphorylation sites within Mcm4.
|
; Montagnoli et al. 2002), and in HeLa cells, antibody injection experiments indicate that Dbf4 is essential for DNA replication (Kumagai et al. 1999). When Drf1 expression is knocked down by RNAi in U2OS cells, there is a detectable slowing of progression through S phase, consistent with our data that Drf1 can function in DNA replication (Yoshizawa-Sugata et al. 2005). Although the lack of a more dramatic effect may be due to the relatively inefficient Drf1 knockdown, another interpretation is that Dbf4 is the more important regulatory subunit in transformed cells. Clearly, further work is needed to assess the relative roles of the two DDKs in primary and transformed somatic cells.
Our work and previous data suggest that Cdc7-Drf1 and Cdc7-Dbf4 share key characteristics: Both complexes can stimulate DNA replication (Figs. 2, 4F; Jares et al. 2004; Shechter et al. 2004a), both are recruited to pre-RCs via their regulatory subunits (Supplementary Figs. S6, S7; Jares et al. 2004), and both are able to phosphorylate Mcm2 in vitro (Furukohri et al. 2003; Yanow et al. 2003). Moreover, the fact that rCdc7-Dbf4 completely rescued replication in a Drf1-depleted extract suggests that Cdc7-Drf1 is not uniquely capable of driving a rapid embryonic S phase. Why then did Drf1 evolve? One possible difference between the two regulators might involve their response to checkpoints. Etoposide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, arrests replication initiation and induces dissociation of Dbf4, but not Drf1, from Cdc7 (Costanzo et al. 2003; Yanow et al. 2003). These data suggest that Cdc7-Drf1 is resistant to inhibition by certain cell cycle checkpoints, a property that might be important to establish rapid embryonic cell cycles that are refractory to arrest. An alternative hypothesis is that the two DDKs have evolved to deal with different forms of chromatin structure. Cdc7-Drf1 might be designed to facilitate efficient initiation from the open, nontranscribed chromatin present in the embryo, while Cdc7-Dbf4 may be better suited for the highly compacted chromatin seen in somatic cells.
|
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractResults and DiscussionMaterials and methodsAcknowledgmentsReferences |
|---|
Extract preparation, replication assays, and chromatin-binding assays in the nucleus-free replication system were carried out as described (Walter et al. 1998; Walter and Newport 2000). Sperm nuclei were incubated in HSS at 10,000/µL in all experiments. In LSS (Blow 1993), sperm nuclei were incubated at 3000/µL in all experiments, and chromatin isolation and replication were carried out as described previously (Takahashi et al. 2004). The amount of DNA synthesis was calculated using the method described by Blow and Laskey (1986), which takes into account the concentration of endogenous dNTPs. Endogenous dNTP concentration was measured for each fresh extract, and for immunodepleted extracts, this number was multiplied by 0.8, the experimentally determined dilution factor that results from the immunodepletion procedure. For phosphatase treament, 1 µL of extract was incubated with 400 U of 
-protein phosphatase (New England Biolabs) in 10 µL of -phosphatase buffer (New England Biolabs) containing 2 mM MnCl2 at 30°C for 30 min. Other experimental procedures are described in the Supplemental Material.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
TopAbstractResults and DiscussionMaterials and methodsAcknowledgmentsReferences |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.1339805.
E-MAIL johannes_walter{at}hms.harvard.edu; FAX (617) 738-0516. 
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractResults and DiscussionMaterials and methodsAcknowledgmentsReferences |
|---|
Blow, J.J. 1993. Preventing re-replication of DNA in a single cell cycle: Evidence for a replication licensing factor. J. Cell. Biol. 122: 993-1002.
Blow, J.J. and Laskey, R.A. 1986. Initiation of DNA replication in nuclei and purified DNA by a cell-free extract of Xenopus eggs. Cell 47: 577-587.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brown, G.W. and Kelly, T.J. 1998. Purification of Hsk1, a minichromosome maintenance protein kinase from fission yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 22083-22090.
Costanzo, V., Shechter, D., Lupardus, P.J., Cimprich, K.A., Gottesman, M., and Gautier, J. 2003. An ATR- and Cdc7-dependent DNA damage checkpoint that inhibits initiation of DNA replication. Mol. Cell 11: 203-213.[CrossRef][Medline]
Furukohri, A., Sato, N., Masai, H., Arai, K., Sugino, A., and Waga, S. 2003. Identification and characterization of a Xenopus homolog of Dbf4, a regulatory subunit of the Cdc7 protein kinase required for the initiation of DNA replication. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 134: 447-457.
Hardy, C.F., Dryga, O., Seematter, S., Pahl, P.M., and Sclafani, R.A. 1997. mcm5/cdc46-bob1 bypasses the requirement for the S phase activator Cdc7p. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94: 3151-3155.
Howe, J.A., Howell, M., Hunt, T., and Newport, J.W. 1995. Identification of a developmental timer regulating the stability of embryonic cyclin A and a new somatic A-type cyclin at gastrulation. Genes & Dev. 9: 1164-1176.
Jares, P. and Blow, J.J. 2000. Xenopus cdc7 function is dependent on licensing but not on XORC, XCdc6, or CDK activity and is required for XCdc45 loading. Genes & Dev. 14: 1528-1540.
Jares, P., Luciani, M.G., and Blow, J.J. 2004. A Xenopus Dbf4 homolog is required for Cdc7 chromatin binding and DNA replication. BMC Mol. Biol. 5: 5.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jiang, W., McDonald, D., Hope, T.J., and Hunter, T. 1999. Mammalian Cdc7-Dbf4 protein kinase complex is essential for initiation of DNA replication. EMBO J. 18: 5703-5713.[CrossRef][Medline]
Johnston, L.H., Masai, H., and Sugino, A. 1999. First the CDKs, now the DDKs. Trends Cell. Biol. 9: 249-252.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kumagai, H., Sato, N., Yamada, M., Mahony, D., Seghezzi, W., Lees, E., Arai, K., and Masai, H. 1999. A novel growth- and cell cycle-regulated protein, ASK, activates human Cdc7-related kinase and is essential for G1/S transition in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 5083-5095.
Lee, J.K., Seo, Y.S., and Hurwitz, J. 2003. The Cdc23 (Mcm10) protein is required for the phosphorylation of minichromosome maintenance complex by the Dfp1-Hsk1 kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 2334-2339.
Lei, M., Kawasaki, Y., Young, M.R., Kihara, M., Sugino, A., and Tye, B.K. 1997. Mcm2 is a target of regulation by Cdc7-Dbf4 during the initiation of DNA synthesis. Genes & Dev. 11: 3365-3374.
Masai, H., Matsui, E., You, Z., Ishimi, Y., Tamai, K., and Arai, K. 2000. Human Cdc7-related kinase complex: In vitro phosphorylation of MCM by concerted actions of Cdks and Cdc7 and that of a criticial threonine residue of Cdc7 bY Cdks. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 29042-29052.
Montagnoli, A., Bosotti, R., Villa, F., Rialland, M., Brotherton, D., Mercurio, C., Berthelsen, J., and Santocanale, C. 2002. Drf1, a novel regulatory subunit for human Cdc7 kinase. EMBO J. 21: 3171-3181.[CrossRef][Medline]
Newport, J. and Dasso, M. 1989. On the coupling between DNA replication and mitosis. J. Cell. Sci. Suppl. 12: 149-160.[Medline]
Newport, J. and Kirschner, M. 1982a. A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos, I: Characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage. Cell 30: 675-686.[CrossRef][Medline]
____. 1982b. A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos, II: Control of the onset of transcription. Cell 30: 687-696.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nieuwkoop, P.D. and Faber, J. 1967. Normal table of Xenopus laevis. North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pacek, M. and Walter, J.C. 2004. A requirement for MCM7 and Cdc45 in chromosome unwinding during eukaryotic DNA replication. EMBO J. 23: 3667-3676.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pereverzeva, I., Whitmire, E., Khan, B., and Coue, M. 2000. Distinct phosphoisoforms of the Xenopus Mcm4 protein regulate the function of the Mcm complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 3667-3676.
Sato, N., Arai, K., and Masai, H. 1997. Human and Xenopus cDNAs encoding budding yeast Cdc7-related kinases: In vitro phosphorylation of MCM subunits by a putative human homologue of Cdc7. EMBO J. 16: 4340-4351.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shechter, D., Costanzo, V., and Gautier, J. 2004a. ATR and ATM regulate the timing of DNA replication origin firing. Nat. Cell. Biol. 6: 648-655.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shechter, D., Ying, C.Y., and Gautier, J. 2004b. DNA unwinding is an Mcm complex-dependent and ATP hydrolysis-dependent process. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 45586-45593.
Takahashi, T.S., Yiu, P., Chou, M.F., Gygi, S., and Walter, J.C. 2004. Recruitment of Xenopus Scc2 and cohesin to chromatin requires the pre-replication complex. Nat. Cell. Biol. 6: 991-996.[CrossRef][Medline]
Takahashi, T.S., Wigley, D.B., and Walter, J.C. 2005. Pumps, paradoxes and ploughshares: Mechanism of the MCM2-7 DNA helicase. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30: 437-444.[CrossRef][Medline]
Takeda, T., Ogino, K., Tatebayashi, K., Ikeda, H., Arai, K., and Masai, H. 2001. Regulation of initiation of S phase, replication checkpoint signaling, and maintenance of mitotic chromosome structures during S phase by Hsk1 kinase in the fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12: 1257-1274.
Walter, J.C. 2000. Evidence for sequential action of cdc7 and cdk2 protein kinases during initiation of DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 39773-39778.
Walter, J. and Newport, J. 2000. Initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication: Origin unwinding and sequential chromatin association of Cdc45, RPA, and DNA polymerase 
. Mol. Cell 5: 617-627.[CrossRef][Medline]
Walter, J., Sun, L., and Newport, J. 1998. Regulated chromosomal DNA replication in the absence of a nucleus. Mol. Cell 1: 519-529.[CrossRef][Medline]
Weinreich, M. and Stillman, B. 1999. Cdc7p-Dbf4p kinase binds to chromatin during S phase and is regulated by both the APC and the RAD53 checkpoint pathway. EMBO J. 18: 5334-5346.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yanow, S.K., Gold, D.A., Yoo, H.Y., and Dunphy, W.G. 2003. Xenopus Drf1, a regulator of Cdc7, displays checkpoint-dependent accumulation on chromatin during an S-phase arrest. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 41083-41092.
Yoshizawa-Sugata, N., Ishii, A., Taniyama, C., Matsui, E., Arai, K.I., and Masai, H. 2005. A second human Dbf4/ASK-related protein, Drf1/ASKL1, is required for efficient progression of S and M phases. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 13062-13070.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. S. Takahashi, A. Basu, V. Bermudez, J. Hurwitz, and J. C. Walter Cdc7-Drf1 kinase links chromosome cohesion to the initiation of DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts Genes & Dev., July 15, 2008; 22(14): 1894 - 1905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Devault, E. Gueydon, and E. Schwob Interplay between S-Cyclin-dependent Kinase and Dbf4-dependent Kinase in Controlling DNA Replication through Phosphorylation of Yeast Mcm4 N-Terminal Domain Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2008; 19(5): 2267 - 2277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Tenca, D. Brotherton, A. Montagnoli, S. Rainoldi, C. Albanese, and C. Santocanale Cdc7 Is an Active Kinase in Human Cancer Cells Undergoing Replication Stress J. Biol. Chem., January 5, 2007; 282(1): 208 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Masai, C. Taniyama, K. Ogino, E. Matsui, N. Kakusho, S. Matsumoto, J.-M. Kim, A. Ishii, T. Tanaka, T. Kobayashi, et al. Phosphorylation of MCM4 by Cdc7 Kinase Facilitates Its Interaction with Cdc45 on the Chromatin J. Biol. Chem., December 22, 2006; 281(51): 39249 - 39261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Liu, L. R. Barkley, T. Day, X. Bi, D. M. Slater, M. G. Alexandrow, H.-P. Nasheuer, and C. Vaziri The Chk1-mediated S-phase Checkpoint Targets Initiation Factor Cdc45 via a Cdc25A/Cdk2-independent Mechanism J. Biol. Chem., October 13, 2006; 281(41): 30631 - 30644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. E. Moyer, P. W. Lewis, and M. R. Botchan Isolation of the Cdc45/Mcm2-7/GINS (CMG) complex, a candidate for the eukaryotic DNA replication fork helicase PNAS, July 5, 2006; 103(27): 10236 - 10241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Silva, R. H. Bradley, Y. Gao, and M. Coue Xenopus CDC7/DRF1 Complex Is Required for the Initiation of DNA Replication J. Biol. Chem., April 28, 2006; 281(17): 11569 - 11576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Petersen, D. M. Chou, Z. You, T. Hunter, J. C. Walter, and G. Walter Protein Phosphatase 2A Antagonizes ATM and ATR in a Cdk2- and Cdc7-Independent DNA Damage Checkpoint. Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2006; 26(5): 1997 - 2011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
