![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
RESEARCH PAPER
1 Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA; 2 Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98125, USA
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract ResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsAcknowledgmentsReferences |
|---|
[Keywords: Telomerase; HPV; transcriptional repressor; ubiquitin; E6; E6-AP]
Received April 23, 2004; revised version accepted July 21, 2004.
; Elenbaas et al. 2001). Several recent investigations have determined that the combined effects of disruption of the Rb/p16 pathway and induction of telomerase activity are sufficient to immortalize human epithelial cells (Kiyono et al. 1998; Garbe et al. 1999; Lundberg et al. 2002). The human papillomavirus (HPV) type-16 oncoproteins, E6 and E7, target these pathways to efficiently immortalize primary epithelial cells (Kiyono et al. 1998; Fehrmann and Laimins 2003). Although the E7 oncoprotein abrogates the Rb/p16 pathway by disrupting the Rb/E2F interaction and targeting Rb for degradation (Boyer et al. 1996; Helt and Galloway 2001), the E6 oncoprotein promotes the degradation of p53 through its interaction with the cellular E6-associated protein, E6-AP, an E3 ubiquitin ligase (Scheffner et al. 1993). In addition, E6 induces telomerase activity, thereby contributing to the immortalization of epithelial cells by maintaining telomere length (Klingelhutz et al. 1996). Studies of mutated E6 proteins reveal that induction of telomerase is an independent function of E6 separable from p53 degradation and that telomerase activation rather than p53 degradation is the critical step for immortalization of epithelial cells (Klingelhutz et al. 1996; Kiyono et al. 1998).
Several groups, including ours, have found that activation of telomerase by E6 is due to its ability to induce expression of hTERT, the catalytic and rate-limiting subunit of telomerase (Gewin and Galloway 2001; Oh et al. 2001; Veldman et al. 2001). Given that the majority of tumor cells have induced expression of hTERT, the mechanisms regulating the hTERT promoter are the subject of extensive investigation. Although the hTERT promoter region lies within a CpG island, promoter methylation does not appear to be the primary mode of silencing hTERT expression in telomerase negative cells (Devereux et al. 1999; Dessain et al. 2000). Chromatin conformation, on the other hand, does seem to play a key role in hTERT activity. Several studies have demonstrated that inhibition of histone deacetylases by trichostatin A in certain telomerase-negative cells can alter the chromatin structure and induce telomerase expression (Cong and Bacchetti 2000; Takakura et al. 2001; Hou et al. 2002). Interestingly, induction of telomerase by E6 also seems to involve an epigenetic mechanism that regulates the extent of hTERT induction. Different clones of human foreskin keratinocytes (HFKs) transduced with E6 express varying levels of hTERT that increase as cells are passaged in culture despite no accompanying increase in E6 expression levels (Klingelhutz et al. 1996; Kiyono et al. 1998; Baege et al. 2002).
The hTERT promoter contains many known transcription factor-binding sites, including several E boxes and Sp1 sites (Horikawa et al. 1999; Takakura et al. 1999; Wick et al. 1999). Although c-Myc is able to bind the E boxes in the hTERT promoter and can induce hTERT expression in many cell types (Wang et al. 1998; Greenberg et al. 1999; Wu et al. 1999), we and others have found no correlation between c-Myc expression and the ability of E6 to induce hTERT (Gewin and Galloway 2001; Oh et al. 2001; Veldman et al. 2001). We have, however, determined that the promoter region including the proximal E box is important for E6-mediated hTERT induction (Gewin and Galloway 2001; Veldman et al. 2001).
In an effort to elucidate the mechanism by which E6 induces hTERT, we began to characterize the ability of E6 and mutated versions of E6 to induce hTERT, to target p53 for degradation, and to bind to E6-AP. A strong correlation between E6-AP binding and hTERT induction prompted the search for possible new targets of the E6/E6-AP complex by a yeast two-hybrid screen. In addition to several known targets of E6/E6-AP, the screen identified a transcriptional repressor known as NFX1. This work describes both a requirement for E6-AP and a role for NFX1 in E6-mediated hTERT induction.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsAcknowledgmentsReferences |
|---|
The initial discovery that E6 induces expression of hTERT immediately prompted speculation that this function might be linked to the well-established p53 degradation function of E6. Although overexpression of p53 has been shown to repress hTERT expression in some tumor cell lines (Kanaya et al. 2000; Xu et al. 2000), inactivation of p53 is insufficient to induce telomerase (Hahn et al. 1999a; Opitz et al. 2001). Furthermore, hTERT induction and p53 degradation are separable and distinct functions of E6 as indicated by E6 mutants such as F2V, 8S/9A/10T, and Y54H that can activate telomerase but do not target p53 for degradation (Table 1; Klingelhutz et al. 1996; Liu et al. 1999). Yet, review of several published studies characterizing mutants of E6 revealed that mutants that retain the ability to target p53 for degradation could also induce hTERT expression (Table 1; Foster et al. 1994; Dalal et al. 1996; Zimmermann et al. 1999). As the E6/E6-AP E3 ubiquitin ligase complex targets p53 for degradation, binding of E6 to E6-AP may also be required for hTERT induction. Additional in vitro E6/E6-AP binding studies (data not shown), as well as published data (Table 1), revealed a strong correlation between E6 binding to E6-AP and telomerase activation. All of the mutated E6 proteins that could bind E6-AP induced hTERT expression or immortalized post-M0-mammary epithelial cells.
|
; Grandori et al. 2003; Smith et al. 2003). Three different 26- to 29-nt regions of the E6-AP gene were targeted to identify a construct that would give the greatest decrease in E6-AP expression. Figure 1A shows shRNA1 (esh1) was the most effective of the three, reducing expression of E6-AP RNA to 
29% of that in the vector-control infected cells. The other two hairpins (esh2 and esh3) exhibited intermediate levels of effectiveness.
|
A new target of E6/E6-AP
Our studies revealed that E6 must bind to E6-AP but not necessarily to p53 in order to induce hTERT. A survey of previously identified cellular targets of E6/E6-AP did not reveal any logical contenders for hTERT transcriptional regulators; therefore, we began to search for new targets of E6/E6-AP by a yeast two-hybrid screen. The bait construct consisted of a catalytically defective E6-AP (C833A) fused to the Gal4 DNA-binding domain. To ensure equal dosage of both E6 and E6-AP, the plasmid also encoded the E6 oncoprotein. In a screen of both fetal brain and HeLa cell cDNA libraries, several known E6/E6-AP interactors were identified, including p53, HHR23A (human homolog of rad23), and a homolog of the E6TP1 gene (Unigene Hs. 406879; Scheffner et al. 1993; Gao et al. 1999; Kumar et al. 1999). In addition, a new E6/E6-AP target protein identified in the screen was NFX1 (nuclear factor binds to the X1 box), a transcriptional repressor of MHC class II genes (Song et al. 1994). NFX1 was originally described and cloned in a screen for proteins that bound to the X-box region of MHC class II genes and is thought to be involved in a feedback loop to limit the immune response following infection (Song et al. 1994).
Recent advancements in the annotation of the human genome revealed that NFX1 has two splice variants encoding isoforms with identical N termini and variant C termini (Fig. 2A, Unigene Hs. 413074). We will specify the longer 1120-amino acid isoform here as NFX1-123, as it is 123 kDa, and the shorter 833-amino acid isoform as NFX1-91 (91 kDa). Both isoforms have a RING finger/PHD finger domain; found in many E3 ubiquitin ligases, this domain has been shown to confer autoubiquitination activity to NFX1 in in vitro assays (Lorick et al. 1999). The RING finger domain is followed by several cysteine/histidine-rich sequences identified as NFX1-type zinc fingers by the Pfam database (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/cgi-bin/Pfam/getacc?PF01422). Identified as the DNA-binding domain of NFX1 (Song et al. 1994), these zinc fingers [C-X(1-6)-H-X-C-X3-C-(H/C)-X(3-4)(H/C)-X(1-10)-C] are highly homologous to one another but do not exhibit the typical spacing of traditional zinc fingers. NFX1-91 contains the first six zinc fingers followed by a unique lysine-rich stretch of 25 amino acids, whereas NFX1-123 contains eight zinc fingers as well as a region known as an R3H domain believed to be involved in single-stranded nucleic acid binding (Fig. 2A). The NFX1 gene is highly conserved among eukaryotic species, though little is known about the functions of its homologs.
|
Activity in hTERT luciferase reporter assays was used as a functional screen for the hits from the yeast two-hybrid screen. Although the hTERT promoter is inactive in primary HFKs, expression of either c-Myc or E6 can induce an hTERT luciferase reporter construct (Fig. 2B). Transfection of the NFX1 isoforms alone with the reporter construct had subtle effects, with NFX1-91 reducing activity to 60% of background levels, whereas NFX1-123 had virtually no effect (Fig. 2C). To investigate the activities of the NFX1 isoforms in the context of an activated promoter, we performed cotransfection experiments with c-myc (Fig. 2C). NFX1-123 strongly coactivated the hTERT promoter when cotransfected with c-myc, whereas NFX1-91 robustly repressed induction by c-myc. Interestingly, cotransfection of c-myc and E6 cooperatively increased hTERT promoter activity, with even higher activity on NFX1-123 cotransfection. Coexpression of NFX1-91 reduced hTERT activity. These assays indicated that NFX1-91 functioned as a transcriptional repressor, whereas NFX1-123 appeared to be a coactivator of transcription.
As NFX1 was originally identified in a screen for proteins that bind the X box of MHC class II genes, the presence of similar sequences in the hTERT promoter was investigated. The MHC class II X-box sequence is CCTAGCAACAGATG (highly conserved residues are underlined; Song et al. 1994). Sequence scanning of the promoter found two possible X-box-like sequences within the hTERT proximal promoter (Fig. 2B). One of these X-box-like sequences (CGTGGGAAGCCCTG) overlapped with the proximal E box and the other (CCTGGGAACAGGTG) lay in the reverse orientation 400 bp upstream of the transcription start site. In an attempt to map the regions of the hTERT promoter bound by the NFX1 isoforms, luciferase assays were performed with a truncated version of the hTERT promoter, lacking the upstream putative X box. Activity of the NFX1 isoforms on an 800-bp region (710 hTERT) of the hTERT promoter was compared with that on a 300-bp region (219 hTERT; Fig. 2B,D). Interestingly, whereas the coactivation function of NFX1-123 was clearly apparent with the longer promoter construct, it was greatly diminished with the minimal 219 hTERT promoter. In contrast, the repressive effects of NFX1-91 could be demonstrated using both promoter constructs. This suggests that these two isoforms may have differential binding affinities for specific elements within the hTERT promoter or NFX1-123 may require the presence of additional cofactors bound upstream. It should be noted that c-Myc induction of the 219 hTERT construct was significantly lower than that seen with the longer promoter region and this may impact the coactivation ability of NFX1-123.
In summary, luciferase reporter assays indicated that NFX1-91 was a repressor of the hTERT promoter, whereas NFX1-123 could coactivate the hTERT promoter dependent on sequences located upstream of the minimal 219 promoter fragment.
NFX1-91 binds a putative X box in the proximal promoter of hTERT
To address whether the NFX1 isoforms directly bind the proximal putative X box within the hTERT promoter, we generated recombinant His-tagged NFX1 proteins and purified them for use in electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA). The recombinant proteins were truncated to include only the RING finger domain and the NFX1-type zinc fingers, as this is the proposed DNA-binding region (Fig. 3A; Song et al. 1994). Using titrations of recombinant protein, we found that His-NFX1-91 bound and shifted a 48-bp region surrounding the proximal E box and overlapping putative X box much more strongly than similar quantities of His-NFX1-123 (Fig. 3A). The ability of both proteins to bind this region was slightly diminished on mutation of five residues within the X box. Thus, NFX1-91 appeared to have a higher affinity than NFX1-123 for the hTERT proximal promoter that appeared to be specific for the X-box region.
|
16E6 preferentially binds and destabilizes NFX1-91 rather than NFX1-123
Given the repressive effects of NFX1-91 on the hTERT promoter in luciferase assays and its ability to bind the proximal promoter of hTERT, an attractive hypothesis emerged that E6/E6-AP might target NFX1-91 for degradation, thereby relieving repression at the hTERT promoter. Analysis of the RNA expression levels of the NFX1 isoforms in HFKs expressing E6 or a vector control (LXSN), HeLa (HPV 18-positive cervical carcinoma), C33A (HPV-negative cervical carcinoma), and irrelevant U2OS (osteosarcoma) cells by RT-PCR revealed that the level of expression of the two isoforms did not vary greatly between cell types (Supplementary Fig. S1). As the E6/E6-AP complex reduces expression of its targets by ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation, the effect of E6 expression on NFX1 protein levels was determined. A time course of cells treated with cycloheximide revealed substantial differences in the expression level and half-life of NFX1-91 in HFK/E6 cells compared with HFK/LXSN cells. Although NFX1-91 had an apparently short half-life in the absence of E6, its stability was further decreased in the presence of E6 (Fig. 4A). In contrast, NFX1-123 seemed to be an abundant, stable protein that was largely unaffected by E6 expression (Fig. 4A). To more accurately measure the half-life of NFX1-91 in the presence and absence of E6 expression, we performed pulse-chase labeling of HFKs expressing E6 wild-type and mutant proteins followed by immunoprecipitation with an antibody specific for NFX1-91. As shown in Figure 4B, E6 expression reduced the half-life of NFX1-91 46%, from 2.5 h in vector control cells to 1.3 h in E6-expressing cells. Expression of two E6 mutants, F2V and 8S/9A/10T, which induce telomerase but do not target p53 for degradation despite their ability to bind E6-AP, caused reductions in NFX1-91 half-life similar to that found with E6 wild type (Fig. 4B). The reduction of NFX1-91 protein levels in E6-expressing HFKs was proteasome dependent, as treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG-132 restored NFX1-91 protein levels to that found in vector-transduced HFKs (Fig. 4C). Although E6 interacted with NFX1-123 in the yeast two-hybrid screen and in in vitro binding assays (data not shown), E6 preferentially bound to NFX1-91 and not to NFX1-123 in coimmunoprecipitations from 293Ts transiently transfected with AU1-tagged E6 (Fig. 4D). Although we were unable to confirm the interaction with the reciprocal coimmunoprecipitation using NFX1 rabbit polyclonal antibody, the sum of the other protein expression data and binding data strongly suggested that NFX1-91 was a novel target of the E6/E6-AP E3 ubiquitin ligase complex.
|
As E6 appeared to preferentially bind and destabilize NFX1-91 in a proteasome-dependent manner, we examined the ubiquitination status of NFX1-91 versus NFX1-123 in cell lysates. For these experiments, Flag-tagged versions of the NFX1 isoforms were transiently transfected into 293T cells in order to specifically immunoprecipitate the two different isoforms. Although expression of both isoforms was driven by the CMV promoter, NFX1-123 was much more highly expressed than NFX1-91 on transfection (Fig. 5A), consistent with the differences in protein stability previously observed (Fig. 4). In addition, Western blots with a ubiquitin antibody revealed a strong ladder signal only in the Flag-tagged NFX1-91 immunoprecipitations (Fig. 5B), indicating NFX1-91 was highly ubiquitinated whereas NFX1-123 was not, thus explaining their different half-lives. As this experiment was conducted in cells lacking E6 expression, it indicated that NFX1-91 protein levels, much like p53 protein levels, were regulated in a proteasome-dependent manner even in the absence of E6. To determine if E6 expression could influence the degree of NFX1-91 ubiquitination, we repeated the experiment in HFK/LXSN and HFK/E6 cells with endogenous NFX1 protein. We developed specific antibodies to separately immunoprecipitate each isoform of NFX1. As seen in Figure 5C, ubiquitinated NFX1-91 was much more prevalent in HFK/E6 cells than in HFK/LXSN cells, and NFX1-123 did not appear to be ubiquitinated. A longer exposure of the ubiquitin Western blot shown in Figure 5C indicated that there is some ubiquitinated NFX1-91 in HFK/LXSN cells (data not shown). Therefore, as we saw in Figure 5B with the 293T cells, an E6-independent means of ubiquitinating NFX1-91 seems to exist. Significantly, the higher levels of ubiquitinated NFX1-91 detected in HFK/E6 cells directly correlated with the decreased stability of NFX1-91 protein in the presence of E6 (Fig. 4), strongly supporting the hypothesis that NFX1-91 is a target of E6/E6-AP-mediated degradation.
|
Thus far, luciferase reporter assays suggested NFX1-91 functions as a repressor at the hTERT promoter and protein expression data indicated that the E6/E6-AP complex could destabilize NFX1-91 protein, suggestive of a relief of repression mechanism for E6-mediated hTERT induction. To address directly whether NFX1-91 functions as a transcriptional repressor at the endogenous hTERT promoter, we reduced NFX1-91 expression using stable shRNA expression in HFKs. We constructed an shRNA construct targeted to the unique 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) of NFX1-91. The NFX1-91 shRNA (n91sh) reduced NFX1-91 protein levels in HFKs while not affecting NFX1-123 protein levels (Fig. 6A). This was accompanied by derepression of the hTERT promoter even in cells lacking E6 expression (Fig. 6B). The previously characterized E6-AP sh1 (esh1) construct (Fig. 1) was included as a negative control. When the shRNA-expressing cell lines were subsequently transduced with empty vector or E6, the E6 cells with reduced NFX1-91 expression had a greater than twofold increased expression of hTERT as demonstrated by RT-PCR and TRAP assay (Fig. 6C,D). Furthermore, the lower telomerase activity resulting from decreasing E6-AP expression in HFK/E6 cells correlated with increased NFX1-91 protein levels, decreased detection of ubiquitinated NFX1-91, and an increased half-life of NFX1-91 from 1.2 to 1.7 h (Fig. 6E,F). These data indicated that NFX1-91 functions as a transcriptional repressor at the endogenous hTERT promoter in HFKs and that the activity of the hTERT promoter increased in response to decreased NFX1-91 protein expression levels, either by shRNA expression or by E6/E6-AP-mediated ubiquitination and degradation.
|
2 mo (Fig. 7A). As cells divide, the telomeres of cells that do not express telomerase continually shorten and the telomere structure becomes disrupted (Hahn et al. 1999b; Masutomi et al. 2003). Cells respond to the chromosome ends as though they are a double-stranded DNA break and generally attempt to repair the exposed chromosome ends or initiate a senescent arrest (Espejel and Blasco 2002; d'Adda di Fagagna et al. 2003; Takai et al. 2003). Senescent cells can be identified by a change in cellular morphology and with a marker for senescent-associated (SA)-
-galactosidase activity (Dimri et al. 1995). As expected, there were fewer senescent cells present in the E6-expressing population compared with the vector control population (Fig. 7B). Furthermore, about half of the E6 cells with reduced E6-AP expression stained positive for SA--galactosidase and appeared large and flattened with many vacuoles (Fig. 7B,C). In contrast, the n91sh-expressing cells, even in the absence of E6 expression, were more rounded like rapidly dividing cells and displayed reduced SA--galactosidase staining. The percent of cells exhibiting SA--galactosidase activity (Fig. 7C) was inversely related to the telomerase activity detected at earlier passages (Fig. 6C,D). Additionally, the cells with increased telomerase activity had increased proliferative capacity in culture, as indicated by the number of population doublings each cell line achieved during the same number of days in culture (Fig. 7A,B). Therefore, reduction of NFX1-91 protein levels either via reduction of mRNA levels with shRNA or via E6/E6-AP-mediated ubiquitination and degradation was sufficient to induce hTERT expression and delay senescent growth arrest in primary human epithelial cells. Conversely, reduced E6-AP expression prohibits E6-mediated telomerase induction and lifespan extension through the stabilization of the hTERT transcriptional repressor, NFX1-91.
|
). This may indicate that telomerase is acting only at the shortest telomeres to maintain proper telomere structure rather than increasing telomere lengths (Hemann et al. 2001; Masutomi et al. 2003). We propose that the continued proliferation and lack of -galactosidase-positive cells in the telomerase-expressing cells more accurately reflects the maintenance of proper telomere structure than the gross changes in telomere length observed by telomere-length Southern blot analysis. |
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsAcknowledgmentsReferences |
|---|
; Scheffner and Whitaker 2003), including a large family of PDZ domain-containing proteins that are membrane-associated guanylate kinases, or MAGUKs (Thomas et al. 2001). The PDZ-binding domain of E6, encompassing the four C-terminal amino acids, has been shown to be required for transformation of established rodent cells by E6 (Kiyono et al. 1997) but is dispensable for immortalization by E6 (Kiyono et al. 1998). Therefore it is unlikely that any of the PDZ-containing proteins targeted by E6 are involved in telomerase activation. Here, we provide direct evidence of the requirement for E6-AP expression for E6-mediated hTERT induction (Fig. 1). These findings prompted the search for novel targets of the E6/E6-AP complex that might function as transcriptional repressors at the hTERT promoter. Identified as an interactor of E6/E6-AP in a yeast two-hybrid screen, NFX1, a known transcriptional repressor, seemed an ideal candidate for a hypothesized telomerase repressor degraded on E6 expression in epithelial cells. This gene actually encoded two splice variants, NFX1-123 and NFX1-91, with opposing activities in hTERT reporter assays (Fig. 2). NFX1-123 strongly coactivated with c-Myc at the hTERT promoter, whereas NFX1-91 repressed the activity of the promoter. Coexpression of E6 with either isoform increased the activity of the promoter, suggesting that E6 could co-operatively activate hTERT with NFX1-123 and could decrease the repressive effects of NFX1-91. Furthermore, coimmunoprecipitation experiments indicated that the E6/E6-AP complex preferentially interacted with the NFX1-91 isoform and stimulated its ubiquitination and degradation (Figs. 4, 5). We propose that E6/E6-AP induces telomerase by destabilizing the hTERT transcriptional repressor, NFX1-91. In support of this hypothesis, decreased expression of NFX1-91 using shRNAs was sufficient to induce hTERT expression and telomerase activity in primary human epithelial cells (Fig. 6). Unfortunately, as seen in Figure 5A, NFX1-91 did not overexpress well despite repeated attempts (data not shown); therefore, we were unable to demonstrate repression of the hTERT promoter in response to increased expression of NFX1-91.
A recent study by Lin and Elledge (2003) found three tumor suppressor/oncogene pathways involved in hTERT repression; these were Mad1, menin, and SIP1 (Lin and Elledge 2003). Reduced expression of any one of these hTERT repressors was sufficient to induce hTERT expression in previously telomerase-negative cells. It is striking that these repressors do not seem redundant; oncogenic stimulation that abrogates any one of them is sufficient to relieve repression. Therefore, it is not implausible that, despite the identification of several hTERT repressor proteins, E6/E6AP specifically targets only one transcriptional repressor, NFX1-91, to induce hTERT expression. It is likely that future investigations will reveal different cell-type specificities for hTERT repressors and variability in the responsiveness of different cell types to perturbations of these repressors.
In reporter assays, E6 seems to require an intact proximal E box in the hTERT promoter for activity (Gewin and Galloway 2001; Veldman et al. 2003). Although c-Myc levels do not appear to change dramatically on E6 expression (Gewin and Galloway 2001; Veldman et al. 2001), two groups have recently found by chromatin immunoprecipitation that c-Myc is bound to the hTERT promoter in E6-expressing cells (Baege et al. 2002; Veldman et al. 2003). McMurray and McCance (2003) suggest that in E6-expressing cells, c-Myc replaces USF1 and USF2 at the hTERT promoter, and Veldman et al. (2003) find that c-Myc is bound to the hTERT promoter in both hTERT-negative E7-expressing cells and hTERT-positive E6-expressing cells. In unpublished data from our lab, we also found that c-Myc was bound at the hTERT promoter in both vector control and E6-expressing HFKs. Therefore, binding of c-Myc to the hTERT promoter was not sufficient for promoter activity. Because our data suggested that disruption of the NFX1-91 repressor of telomerase was involved in the activation of telomerase, it is interesting to note that a putative NFX1-binding site overlaps with the proximal E box. EMSA experiments indicate that a recombinant fragment of NFX1-91 binds to this region with significantly higher affinity than a largely similar fragment of NFX1-123. These data help to clarify how NFX1-91, an unstable protein expressed at much lower levels than NFX1-123, could repress the hTERT promoter in the presence of abundant NFX1-123 protein levels. Our future efforts will determine whether either of the two NFX1 isoforms is differentially bound to this site in vivo in E6-expressing cells.
Although reporter assays indicated that the NFX1-123 isoform could function as a coactivator of the hTERT promoter, this isoform is highly expressed, stable, and apparently unaffected by E6 expression. NFX1-123, with its two additional zinc fingers and R3H domain, most likely exists in a very different conformation than NFX1-91 that is not recognized by the E6/E6-AP complex. As structure relates to function, this likely influences the DNA-binding affinity, as seen by EMSA in Figure 3, and functional consequences of DNA binding for NFX1-123. Whether the coactivation function of NFX1-123 is an integral part of E6-mediated hTERT induction remains to be tested. Interestingly, the instability and repressive functions of NFX1-91 as well as its higher affinity for the X-box-like sequences in the hTERT promoter appeared to reside in the unique lysine-rich C terminus.
Although we propose that the targeting of NFX1-91 for ubiquitination and degradation by the E6/E6-AP complex is involved in the induction of telomerase in epithelial cells, this may be only one step in the process of robustly inducing hTERT expression by E6. Previous data have indicated that induction of hTERT by HPV-16 E6 may involve epigenetic phenomenon such as histone acetylation or chromatin remodeling (Klingelhutz et al. 1996; Kiyono et al. 1998; Baege et al. 2002). Many transcriptional regulators function by covalently modifying the histones associated with the nearby chromatin. Recently, it has been demonstrated that ubiquitination of histone H2B may influence the methylation status of histone H3 and thereby mark the chromatin as active for transcription (Muratani and Tansey 2003). Given that E6/E6-AP and the NFX1 RING finger possess E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, it will be interesting to investigate the ubiquitination status of histone H2B at the hTERT promoter in E6-expressing cells.
Ubiquitination and transcriptional activation may also be intimately linked in a developing model involving the ubiquitination and degradation of transcriptional activators bound at promoters (Muratani and Tansey 2003). The activators rely on E3 ligase activity found within coactivators to license their activity and link increased protein turnover with clearing of the promoter for subsequent rounds of transcription. In fact, the Skp2 ubiquitin ligase is a coactivator of c-Myc at the cyclin D2 promoter and loss of Skp2 can stabilize c-Myc protein levels and reduce transactivation of c-Myc-responsive promoters (Kim et al. 2003; von der Lehr et al. 2003). Although c-Myc steady-state levels do not change on E6 expression, it is possible that this is a result of balanced c-Myc induction (Kinoshita et al. 1997) and increased degradation (Gross-Mesilaty et al. 1998). E6/E6-AP has been demonstrated to ubiquitinate c-Myc in vitro and in vivo (Gross-Mesilaty et al. 1998). In fact, E6 has been found at the hTERT promoter and E6 can immunoprecipitate c-Myc from cell lysates (Veldman et al. 2003). Although we have been unable to demonstrate an interaction between c-Myc and E6, it remains possible that these proteins do interact in a complex at the hTERT promoter. An attractive synthesis of this model with our data is that E6/E6-AP may function at multiple levels to induce hTERT. First, the E6/E6-AP complex may target NFX1-91 for increased turnover to derepress the promoter; then, an E3 ligase may ubiquitinate and activate the c-Myc bound at the hTERT promoter. This theory and the possible role of the E3 ligase activity of the NFX1 isoforms or the E6/E6-AP complex to ubiquitinate either histone H2B or c-Myc remains to be tested.
In summary, we have identified NFX1-91 as a novel cellular repressor of the hTERT promoter in primary human epithelial cells. Significantly, interference with its expression is sufficient to induce telomerase expression and extend the lifespan of primary epithelial cells, thus making NFX1-91 an important new target of transformation mechanisms.
|
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsAcknowledgmentsReferences |
|---|
Primary human keratinocytes (HFKs) were derived from neonatal foreskins and grown in EpiLife medium supplemented with calcium chloride (60 µM) and human keratinocyte growth supplement (Cascade Biologics). 293T, HeLa, C33A, and U20S cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (GIBCO-BRL) containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and penicillin-streptomycin. SF9 cells were grown in SF 900 II serum-free medium (GIBCO-BRL) containing 5% FCS and gentamycin.
Plasmids
The E6-AP and NFX1-91 shRNA constructs were generated by previously described methods (Paddison et al. 2002; Grandori et al. 2003; Smith et al. 2003). Briefly, oligos containing the 26- to 29-nt shRNA sequence were used in PCR reactions to clone the U6 or H1 RNA polymerase III promoter upstream into a pBabepuro-based vector. The E6-AP shRNA targeted sequences were as follows: esh1 5'-CTAATAGAACGCTACTACCACCAGTTAAC-3', esh2 5'-AGAGATTGTTGAAGGCCATCACGTATGCC-3', and esh3 5'-ACAATGAAGAAGATGATGAAGAGCCCATC-3'. The n91sh construct was targeted to the 3'UTR region (5'-TGTGGAACCAGCCCAACTGCCCATCAGTCAA-3'). The NFX1-123 isoform was PCR cloned from a HeLa cell cDNA library and the NFX1-91 isoform was cloned from a fetal brain cDNA library. These genes (with and without a Flag tag) were subsequently inserted by restriction digest or via the GATEWAY recombination-based system (Invitrogen) into a CMV-based vector for transient transfections. The AU1 tag (DTYRYI) was fused to the N terminus of 16E6 by PCR and subsequently cloned into a CMV-based vector using the GATEWAY system (Invitrogen). The pBabe-c-myc vector was obtained from Carla Grandori. The pGL3-based hTERT luciferase reporter constructs have been previously described (Gewin and Galloway 2001). The His-tagged NFX1 isoforms were generated by PCR cloning the indicated fragments into the BamHI site of the pET16b vector (Novagen) in frame with multiple histidine residues.
Retroviral infections
Retroviruses were produced either in established viral producer cell lines (PA317 or PG13) or in 293Ts by a transient VSV-G-pseudotyped virus production protocol as previously described (Bartz and Vodicka 1997). Cells were infected at 60% confluence in 6-cm tissue culture plates. Twenty-four hours after infection, cells were expanded to 10-cm plates and allowed to adhere to the plate for 4-24 h before adding selective media. HFKs were selected in 0.5 µg/mL puromycin or 50 µg/mL G418. Cells expressing shRNAs were maintained in puromycin-containing media.
Northern blotting
Total cellular RNA was isolated using the RNeasy kit (QIAGEN). From 20 to 60 µg of total RNA was electrophoresed on 1% agarose-formaldehyde gels, transferred to Hybond-N membranes (Amersham), and hybridized to 32P-labeled probes. The E6-AP probe was generated by random primer labeling (Roche) a 440-bp XhoI fragment of the E6-AP gene. The 36B4 loading control probe has been described previously (Kiyono et al. 1998).
Yeast two-hybrid screen
The yeast two-hybrid screen was performed using the Match-maker GAL4 two-hybrid system (Clontech). A catalytically defective E6-AP mutant (C833A) was fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain in the pGBT9 plasmid. The 16E6 gene was also cloned into this plasmid under the control of the ADH2 promoter. Both a HeLa cell cDNA library and a fetal brain cDNA library were fused to the GAL4 activation domain in the pGAD and pACT2 plasmids, respectively. Clones that grew on selective media were subjected to a secondary screen for -galactosidase activity. Full-length clones were obtained by 5' RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) using the Marathon cDNA amplification kit (Clontech).
Luciferase assays
Luciferase assays were performed as previously described (Gewin and Galloway 2001). Briefly, HFKs were grown to 50%-60% confluence in six-well plates and transfected with a pGL3-based hTERT reporter plasmid (710 hTERT or 219 hTERT) and CMV- or pBabe-based expression constructs. A total of 2 µg of DNA was transfected into each well using a 1:3 DNA:FuGENE (Roche) ratio. Cells were incubated for 24 h after transfection, rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and lysed in the well by freeze-thawing in 100 µL of reporter lysis buffer (Promega). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation. Luminescence was quantitated in 10 µL of each lysate on mixing with luciferase assay buffer (Promega) in a Monolight 2010 luminometer. Each experiment was done several times in duplicate and normalized for total protein concentration.
Recombinant protein purification
pET16b constructs expressing His-tagged NFX1 isoforms were transformed into Codon (+) DE3 cells and grown in 100-mL cultures to an O.D.600 of 0.6. Protein expression was induced for 2 h at room temperature with 0.4 mM isopropyl--D-thio-galactopyranoside (IPTG). Proteins were extracted from inclusion bodies using denaturing conditions (8 M urea, 10 mM Tris-Cl, 100 mM NaH2PO4, 20 mM -mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, 1% NP-40, 300 mM sodium chloride, 20 µM zinc chloride adjusted to pH 8) and purified on Ni-NTA beads (Qiagen). After washing with lysis buffer adjusted to pH 6.3, the beads and bound recombinant proteins were dialyzed stepwise to remove urea and NP-40 prior to elution with increasing concentrations of imidazole (100-250 mM).
EMSA
Probes were generated by radiolabeling, annealing, and gel purifying complementary oligonucleotides containing sequences from the hTERT promoter. Sequences correspond to 15 bp upstream of the proximal E box (CACGTG) and extend 27 bp downstream. Five base pairs were changed (GGAAGCCCTG to TGGGGCCCGA) to generate the X-box mutant probe. Titrations of recombinant proteins (1-6 µL) were incubated with 5000 cpm of radiolabeled probes in 40-µL binding reactions containing 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 5% glycerol, 5 µM zinc chloride, 5 mM magnesium chloride, 50 mM potassium chloride, and 0.1 mg of bovine serum albumin per milliliter. The peptide shifts were performed identically using titrations (20-100 ng) of peptide and supershifted with titrations (1-4 µg) of affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal antibody raised to this peptide. Reactions were run on 4.5% polyacrylamide gels in 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5).
RT-PCR
RNA was isolated from cells using the RNeasy kit (QIAGEN). cDNA was synthesized using random hexamers and the Superscript II reverse transcriptase system (Invitrogen). RNase H (2 units) was added to the reactions and incubated for 20 min at 37°C. Expression of hTERT, NFX1-123, NFX1-91, and 36B4 was detected by PCR using either ethidium bromide staining or [32P]
-dCTP incorporation and autoradiography. Sequences of hTERT and 36B4 primers are previously described (Gewin and Galloway 2001). NFX1-123 primers are (F) 5'-TCCCTCCCAT GAACAGAGAC-3' and (R) 5'-TTTCAAGCACACCTGTCAG C-3'. NFX1-91 primers are (F) 5'-TTACCCTCCAGTTCCCT GTG-3' and (R) 5'-CATGCGTGTGCAGGTATCTT-3'.
Telomerase activity
Telomerase activity was detected using the radioisotopic detection method of the TRAPeze telomerase detection kit (Serologicals Corporation, Chemicon International).
Generation of rabbit polyclonal antibodies
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies were generated to recognize both NFX1 isoforms (-NFX1) and each isoform, NFX1-123 (-NFX1-123) and NFX1-91 (-NFX1-91), individually. Recombinant full-length NFX1-123 was generated in SF9 cells using a baculovirus system. Briefly, NFX1-123 was cloned into the pVIC1 plasmid in which NFX1 was fused to a chitin-binding domain with an intervening intein sequence as described previously (Chong et al. 1997; Pradhan et al. 1999). This construct was transfected into SF9 cells using the BaculoGold system (Pharmingen) to generate infectious baculovirus. SF9s infected with baculovirus were harvested and lysed in buffer M (50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 500 mM sodium chloride, and COMPLETE protease inhibitor tablet). The SF9 protein lysate was precleared on cellulose resin and subsequently purified with chitin beads. Full-length NFX1-123 was cleaved from the chitin-binding domain in two volumes of buffer M plus 0.5% Tween-20, 4 mM dithiothreitol, and 5% glycerol incubated at 16°C overnight and used to generate a rabbit polyclonal antibody to recognize both NFX1 isoforms. The NFX1-123-specific antibody was raised to a recombinant His-tagged C-terminal fragment of NFX1-123 (amino acids 932-1120) expressed in and purified from Escherichia coli. The NFX1-91-specific antibody was raised to a C-terminal peptide (Ac-CASTQKKRSHYMKKIPAH-amide) generated by BIOSOURCE.
Western blotting
Whole-cell lysates were prepared for Western blotting by trypsinizing cells, washing with PBS, and resuspending in WE16th lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 20% glycerol, 10 µM zinc chloride, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 80 mM -glycerophosphate, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and a COMPLETE protease inhibitor tablet [Roche]). Lysates were then sonicated and clarified by centrifugation. Protein concentrations were determined by using the DC protein assay (Bio-Rad). Protein lysates were electrophoresed on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore). Western blots were performed with goat anti-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, I-19), mouse anti-p53 (Oncogene Science, Ab6), mouse anti-c-myc (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, C-33), mouse anti-nucleolin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, C-23), rabbit anti-AU1 (Bethyl), mouse anti-Flag (Sigma, M2), and mouse anti-ubiquitin (Covance, P4G7). Rabbit polyclonal NFX1, NFX1-123, and NFX1-91 antibodies are described earlier.
Proteasome inhibition and cycloheximide treatment
In proteasome inhibition experiments, cells were treated with 10-20 µM MG-132 (Calbiochem) or an equal volume of dimethyl sulfoxide (solvent control) for 4 h at 37°C. For half-life analysis, HFKs were treated with 25 µM cycloheximide (Calbiochem) and harvested in WE16th lysis buffer at the indicated time points.
Pulse-chase labeling of cells and protein half-life calculations
Keratinocytes were metabolically labeled with Express Label [35S]cysteine-[35S]methionine (DuPont NEN) in 154XP medium (Cascade Biologics) for 1 h. Cells were chased for various periods of time with EpiLife keratinocyte medium, washed two times in cold PBS, and lysed on ice for 30 min in RIPA buffer + 1 mM EDTA. Following a brief sonication, the lysates were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until completion of the time course. Lysates were thawed quickly and insoluble debris was pelleted. Lysates were subsequently precleared with protein A agarose prior to immunoprecipitation with preimmune or anti-NFX1-91 rabbit serum. After incubation with protein A agarose beads, immunocomplexes were washed once with RIPA buffer, twice with high-salt buffer (500 mM sodium chloride, 50 mM Tris at pH 8, 1% NP-40), and once more with RIPA buffer. The beads were boiled in sample buffer and electrophoresed on a 6% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The gels were dried and subjected to phosphorimaging (Molecular Dynamics). Band intensities were measured using ImageQuant.
Immunoprecipitations
293Ts at 60% confluence in 15-cm plates were transfected with 20 µg of CMV-AU1-16E6 with FuGENE (Roche). Twenty-four hours later, cells were treated with 10 µM MG-132 (Calbiochem) for 2 h prior to harvest. 293Ts were harvested for immunoprecipitation by rinsing with cold PBS. Cells were pelleted and resuspended in an NP-40 lysis buffer (1x PBS, 0.5% NP-40, 10% glycerol, 10 µM zinc chloride, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 80 mM -glycerophosphate, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and a COMPLETE protease inhibitor tablet [Roche]). Cells were lysed by quick freezing in liquid nitrogen and thawing in a room-temperature water bath. Cell debris was pelleted at 14,000 rpm for 15 min and lysates were precleared by rotating at 4°C with 50 µL of protein A agarose (Roche). After centrifugation to remove the beads, lysates were incubated with the appropriate antibody for 1-2 h at 4°C and purified by adding protein A agarose and rotating for another hour at 4°C. Immunocomplexes were washed three times with lysis buffer and eluted by heating for 10 min at 70°C in 2x sample buffer. Elutions were electrophoresed on NuPAGE 4%-12% Tris-Bis gradient gels (Invitrogen) to resolve both AU1-tagged 16E6 and NFX1 isoforms and Western blotted as described earlier.
In vivo ubiquitination assay
Cells were treated with 20 µM MG-132 for 2 h prior to harvest. Lysates were prepared by trypsinizing cells and washing with PBS. Cell pellets were resuspended in 2% SDS in PBS and boiled for 10 min, then diluted in five to six volumes of 1% Triton X-100 in PBS. The lysates were sonicated on ice and clarified by centrifugation followed by preclearing with protein A agarose for 30 min at 4°C. The lysate was subsequently divided for individual immunoprecipitations with the appropriate antibody and incubated at 4°C for 1-2 h. Preimmune rabbit serum and normal rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were used as negative controls. To precipitate bound proteins, we added protein A agarose to each immunoprecipitation and rotated it for 1 h at 4°C. Bound proteins were washed three times with PBS and eluted by boiling for 5 min in 2x sample buffer. Elutions were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and Western blotting as described earlier.
SA--galactosidase staining
Cells were washed three times in PBS containing 1 mM magnesium chloride and fixed in 3% formaldehyde in PBS for 5 min at room temperature. After three washes in PBS (pH 6.0), cells were stained in PBS (pH 6.0) containing 1 mM magnesium chloride, 0.12 mM potassium ferricyanide, 0.12 mM potassium ferrocyanide, and 1 mM X-GAL at 37°C overnight.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
TopAbstractResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsAcknowledgmentsReferences |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.1214704.
3 Corresponding author.
E-MAIL dgallowa{at}fhcrc.org; FAX (206) 667-5815. 
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsAcknowledgmentsReferences |
|---|
Bartz, S.R. and Vodicka, M.A. 1997. Production of high-titer human immunodeficiency virus type 1 pseudotyped with vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein. Methods 12: 337-342.[CrossRef][Medline]
Boyer, S.N., Wazer, D.E., and Band, V. 1996. E7 protein of human papilloma virus-16 induces degradation of retinoblastoma protein through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Cancer Res. 56: 4620-4624.
Chong, S.R., Mersha, F.B., Comb, D.G., Scott, M.E., Landry, D., Vence, L.M., Perler, F.B., Benner, J., Kucera, R.B., Hirvonen, C.A., et al. 1997. Single-column purification of free recombinant proteins using a self-cleavable affinity tag derived from a protein splicing element. Gene 192: 271-281.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cong, Y.S. and Bacchetti, S. 2000. Histone deacetylation is involved in the transcriptional repression of hTERT in normal human cells. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 35665-35668.
Dalal, S., Gao, Q.S., Androphy, E.J., and Band, V. 1996. Mutational analysis of human papillomavirus type 16 E6 demonstrates that p53 degradation is necessary for immortalization of mammary epithelial cells. J. Virol. 70: 683-688.[Abstract]
Dessain, S.K., Yu, H.Y., Reddel, R.R., Beijersbergen, R.L., and Weinberg, R.A. 2000. Methylation of the human telomerase gene CpG island. Cancer Res. 60: 537-541.
Devereux, T.R., Horikawa, I., Anna, C.H., Annab, L.A., Afshari, C.A., and Barrett, J.C. 1999. DNA methylation analysis of the promoter region of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene. Cancer Res. 59: 6087-6090.
d'Adda di Fagagna, F., Reaper, P.M., Clay-Farrace, L., Fiegler, H., Carr, P., von Zglinicki, T., Saretzki, G., Carter, N.P., and Jackson, S.P. 2003. A DNA damage checkpoint response in telomere-initiated senescence. Nature 426: 194-198.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dimri, G.P., Lee, X.H., Basile, G., Acosta, M., Scott, C., Roskelley, C., Medrano, E.E., Linskens, M., Rubelj, I., Pereirasmith, O., et al. 1995. A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92: 9363-9367.
Elenbaas, B., Spirio, L., Koerner, F., Fleming, M.D., Zimonjic, D.B., Donaher, J.L., Popescu, N.C., Hahn, W.C., and Weinberg, R.A. 2001. Human breast cancer cells generated by oncogenic transformation of primary mammary epithelial cells. Genes & Dev. 15: 50-65.
Espejel, S. and Blasco, M.A. 2002. Identification of telomere-dependent `senescence-like' arrest in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Exp. Cell Res. 276: 242-248.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fehrmann, F. and Laimins, L.A. 2003. Human papillomaviruses: Targeting differentiating epithelial cells for malignant transformation. Oncogene 22: 5201-5207.[CrossRef][Medline]
Foster, S.A., Demers, G.W., Etscheid, B.G., and Galloway, D.A. 1994. The ability of human papillomavirus E6 proteins to target p53 for degradation in vivo correlates with their ability to abrogate actinomycin D-induced growth arrest. J. Virol. 68: 5698-5705.
Gao, Q., Srinivasan, S., Boyer, S.N., Wazer, D.E., and Band, V. 1999. The E6 oncoproteins of high-risk papillomaviruses bind to a novel putative GAP protein, E6TP1, and target it for degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19: 733-744.
Garbe, J., Wong, M., Wigington, D., Yaswen, P., and Stampfer, M.R. 1999. Viral oncogenes accelerate conversion to immortality of cultured conditionally immortal human mammary epithelial cells. Oncogene 18: 2169-2180.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gewin, L. and Galloway, D.A. 2001. E box-dependent activation of telomerase by human papillomavirus type 16 E6 does not require induction of c-myc. J. Virol. 75: 7198-7201.
Grandori, C., Wu, K.J., Fernandez, P., Ngouenet, C., Grim, J., Clurman, B.E., Moser, M.J., Oshima, J., Russell, D.W., Swisshelm, K., et al. 2003. Werner syndrome protein limits MYC-induced cellular senescence. Genes & Dev. 17: 1569-1574.
Greenberg, R.A., O'Hagan, R.C., Deng, H., Xiao, Q., Hann, S.R., Adams, R.R., Lichtsteiner, S., Chin, L., Morin, G.B., and DePinho, R.A. 1999. Telomerase reverse transcriptase gene is a direct target of c-Myc but is not functionally equivalent in cellular transformation. Oncogene 18: 1219-1226.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gross-Mesilaty, S., Reinstein, E., Bercovich, B., Tobias, K.E., Schwartz, A.L., Kahana, C., and Ciechanover, A. 1998. Basal and human papillomavirus E6 oncoprotein-induced degradation of Myc proteins by the ubiquitin pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 8058-8063.
Hahn, W.C., Counter, C.M., Lundberg, A.S., Beijersbergen, R.L., Brooks, M.W., and Weinberg, R.A. 1999a. Creation of human tumour cells with defined genetic elements. Nature 400: 464-468.[CrossRef][Medline]
