Genes and Development

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


GENES & DEVELOPMENT 7:857-869, 1993
ISSN 0890-9369
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Axelrod, J D
Right arrow Articles by Majors, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Axelrod, J D
Right arrow Articles by Majors, J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Papers

GAL4 disrupts a repressing nucleosome during activation of GAL1 transcription in vivo.

J D Axelrod, M S Reagan, and J Majors

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.

Abstract

Photofootprinting in vivo of GAL1 reveals an activation-dependent pattern between the UASG and the TATA box, in a sequence not required for transcriptional activation by GAL4. The pattern results from a nucleosome whose position depends on sequences within the UASG. In the wild-type gene, activation by GAL4 and derivatives disrupts this nucleosome. This activity is independent of interactions with DNA-bound core transcription factors and is proportional to the strength of the activator. Presence of the nucleosome correlates with low basal transcription levels under various conditions, suggesting a role in limiting basal expression. We propose a role for the GAL4 activation domain in displacing a nucleosome and suggest that this is part of the mechanism by which GAL4 activates transcription in vivo.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
I. Garcia, R. Gonzalez, D. Gomez, and C. Scazzocchio
Chromatin Rearrangements in the prnD-prnB Bidirectional Promoter: Dependence on Transcription Factors
Eukaryot. Cell, February 1, 2004; 3(1): 144 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J.-H. Kim, J. Polish, and M. Johnston
Specificity and Regulation of DNA Binding by the Yeast Glucose Transporter Gene Repressor Rgt1
Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2003; 23(15): 5208 - 5216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Angermayr and W. Bandlow
Permanent Nucleosome Exclusion from the Gal4p-inducible Yeast GCY1 Promoter
J. Biol. Chem., March 21, 2003; 278(13): 11026 - 11031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Angermayr, U. Oechsner, K. Gregor, G. P. Schroth, and W. Bandlow
Transcription initiation in vivo without classical transactivators: DNA kinks flanking the core promoter of the housekeeping yeast adenylate kinase gene, AKY2, position nucleosomes and constitutively activate transcription
Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2002; 30(19): 4199 - 4207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. M. A. Moreira, W. Horz, and S. Holmberg
Neither Reb1p nor Poly(dA{middle dot}dT) Elements Are Responsible for the Highly Specific Chromatin Organization at the ILV1 Promoter
J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2002; 277(5): 3202 - 3209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
X. Mai, S. Chou, and K. Struhl
Preferential Accessibility of the Yeast his3 Promoter Is Determined by a General Property of the DNA Sequence, Not by Specific Elements
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2000; 20(18): 6668 - 6676.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. P. Ryan, G. A. Stafford, L. Yu, and R. H. Morse
Artificially Recruited TATA-Binding Protein Fails To Remodel Chromatin and Does Not Activate Three Promoters That Require Chromatin Remodeling
Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2000; 20(16): 5847 - 5857.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Di Mauro, S. G. Kendrew, and M. Caserta
Two Distinct Nucleosome Alterations Characterize Chromatin Remodeling at the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH2 Promoter
J. Biol. Chem., March 10, 2000; 275(11): 7612 - 7618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. C. McDowell and A. Dean
Structural and Functional Cross-Talk between a Distant Enhancer and the varepsilon -Globin Gene Promoter Shows Interdependence of the Two Elements in Chromatin
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 1999; 19(11): 7600 - 7609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
B. Balasubramanian and R. H. Morse
Binding of Gal4p and Bicoid to Nucleosomal Sites in Yeast in the Absence of Replication
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 1999; 19(4): 2977 - 2985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. A. Stafford and R. H. Morse
Mutations in the AF-2/Hormone-binding Domain of the Chimeric Activator GAL4·Estrogen Receptor·VP16 Inhibit Hormone-dependent Transcriptional Activation and Chromatin Remodeling in Yeast
J. Biol. Chem., December 18, 1998; 273(51): 34240 - 34246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
K. Ikeda, J.-P. Halle, G. Stelzer, M. Meisterernst, and K. Kawakami
Involvement of Negative Cofactor NC2 in Active Repression by Zinc Finger-Homeodomain Transcription Factor AREB6
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 1998; 18(1): 10 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
S. A. Brown and R. E. Kingston
Disruption of downstream chromatin directed by a transcriptional activator
Genes & Dev., December 1, 1997; 11(23): 3116 - 3121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Lohr
Nucleosome Transactions on the Promoters of the Yeast GAL and PHO Genes
J. Biol. Chem., October 24, 1997; 272(43): 26795 - 26798.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. A. Stafford and R. H. Morse
Chromatin Remodeling by Transcriptional Activation Domains in a Yeast Episome
J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 1997; 272(17): 11526 - 11534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
R E Kingston, C A Bunker, and A N Imbalzano
Repression and activation by multiprotein complexes that alter chromatin structure.
Genes & Dev., April 15, 1996; 10(8): 905 - 920.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. Pazin, R. Kamakaka, and J. Kadonaga
ATP-dependent nucleosome reconfiguration and transcriptional activation from preassembled chromatin templates
Science, December 23, 1994; 266(5193): 2007 - 2011.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
C Klein and K Struhl
Increased recruitment of TATA-binding protein to the promoter by transcriptional activation domains in vivo
Science, October 14, 1994; 266(5183): 280 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. Morse
Nucleosome disruption by transcription factor binding in yeast
Science, December 3, 1993; 262(5139): 1563 - 1566.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. R. Biggar and G. R. Crabtree
Chemically Regulated Transcription Factors Reveal the Persistence of Repressor-resistant Transcription after Disrupting Activator Function
J. Biol. Chem., August 11, 2000; 275(33): 25381 - 25390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Yu, N. Sabet, A. Chambers, and R. H. Morse
The N-terminal and C-terminal Domains of RAP1 Are Dispensable for Chromatin Opening and GCN4-mediated HIS4 Activation in Budding Yeast
J. Biol. Chem., August 24, 2001; 276(35): 33257 - 33264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genome Res. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genes Dev.