Genes and Development

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


GENES & DEVELOPMENT 6:2270-2281, 1992
ISSN 0890-9369
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Croston, G E
Right arrow Articles by Kadonaga, J T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Croston, G E
Right arrow Articles by Kadonaga, J T
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Papers

Mechanism of transcriptional antirepression by GAL4-VP16.

G E Croston, P J Laybourn, S M Paranjape, and J T Kadonaga

Department of Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093.

Abstract

Promoter- and enhancer-binding factors appear to function by facilitating the transcription reaction as well as by counteracting chromatin-mediated repression (antirepression). We have examined the mechanism by which a hybrid activator, GAL4-VP16, is able to counteract histone H1-mediated repression by using both H1-DNA complexes and reconstituted H1-containing chromatin templates. The GAL4 DNA binding domain alone was sufficient to disrupt local H1-DNA interactions, but a transcriptional region was additionally necessary for antirepression. GAL4-VP16-mediated antirepression required an auxiliary factor, denoted as a co-antirepressor, which was partially purified from Drosophila embryos. We have found that the co-antirepressor activity was sensitive to digestion with RNase A. Moreover, total RNA from Drosophila embryos could partially substitute for the co-antirepressor fraction, which indicated that the co-antirepressor may function as a histone acceptor ("histone sink"). These findings suggest a model for gene activation in which sequence-specific transcription factors disrupt H1-DNA interactions at the promoter to facilitate transfer of H1 to a histone acceptor, which then allows access of the basal transcription factors to the DNA template.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
E. Cheung, A. S. Zarifyan, and W. L. Kraus
Histone H1 Represses Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Transcriptional Activity by Selectively Inhibiting Receptor-Mediated Transcription Initiation
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2002; 22(8): 2463 - 2471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. R. Brasier, M. Jamaluddin, A. Casola, W. Duan, Q. Shen, and R. P. Garofalo
A Promoter Recruitment Mechanism for Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha -induced Interleukin-8 Transcription in Type II Pulmonary Epithelial Cells. DEPENDENCE ON NUCLEAR ABUNDANCE OF Rel A, NF-kappa B1, AND c-Rel TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS
J. Biol. Chem., February 6, 1998; 273(6): 3551 - 3561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Ouhammouch, M. H. Sayre, J. T. Kadonaga, and E. P. Geiduschek
Activation of RNA polymerase II by topologically linked DNA-tracking proteins
PNAS, June 24, 1997; 94(13): 6718 - 6723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
S A Brown, A N Imbalzano, and R E Kingston
Activator-dependent regulation of transcriptional pausing on nucleosomal templates.
Genes & Dev., June 15, 1996; 10(12): 1479 - 1490.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
M J Pazin, P L Sheridan, K Cannon, Z Cao, J G Keck, J T Kadonaga, and K A Jones
NF-kappa B-mediated chromatin reconfiguration and transcriptional activation of the HIV-1 enhancer in vitro.
Genes & Dev., January 1, 1996; 10(1): 37 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
A Krumm, L B Hickey, and M Groudine
Promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II defines a general rate-limiting step after transcription initiation.
Genes & Dev., March 1, 1995; 9(5): 559 - 572.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. Pazin, R. Kamakaka, and J. Kadonaga
ATP-dependent nucleosome reconfiguration and transcriptional activation from preassembled chromatin templates
Science, December 23, 1994; 266(5193): 2007 - 2011.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
C Klein and K Struhl
Increased recruitment of TATA-binding protein to the promoter by transcriptional activation domains in vivo
Science, October 14, 1994; 266(5183): 280 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
J Cote, J Quinn, J. Workman, and C. Peterson
Stimulation of GAL4 derivative binding to nucleosomal DNA by the yeast SWI/SNF complex
Science, July 1, 1994; 265(5168): 53 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
R T Kamakaka, M Bulger, and J T Kadonaga
Potentiation of RNA polymerase II transcription by Gal4-VP16 during but not after DNA replication and chromatin assembly.
Genes & Dev., September 1, 1993; 7(9): 1779 - 1795.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Vaquero, M. L. Espinas, F. Azorin, and J. Bernues
Functional Mapping of the GAGA Factor Assigns Its Transcriptional Activity to the C-terminal Glutamine-rich Domain
J. Biol. Chem., June 23, 2000; 275(26): 19461 - 19468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genome Res. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genes Dev.