Genes and Development

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


GENES & DEVELOPMENT 4:52-62, 1990
ISSN 0890-9369
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pape, L K
Right arrow Articles by Sollner-Webb, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pape, L K
Right arrow Articles by Sollner-Webb, B
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Papers

Half helical turn spacing changes convert a frog into a mouse rDNA promoter: a distant upstream domain determines the helix face of the initiation site.

L K Pape, J J Windle, and B Sollner-Webb

Department of Biological Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

Abstract

Transcription of frog rDNA by mouse cell factors is the only documented exception to the observed species selectivity of rRNA gene expression. This heterologous transcription is authentic in that it uses the normal frog upstream and core promoter domains, as well as the normal mouse polymerase I transcription factors, but it initiates at residue -4. We now show that by introducing an insertion or deletion of approximately one-half helical turn anywhere within the 90-bp region between the upstream and core promoter domains, the initiation site moves to residue +1. Promoters bearing spacing changes of approximately one or two full helix turns do not initiate at residue +1, whereas a promoter with a one and one-half-turn helical turn spacing change again supports initiation at residue +1. Thus, the position of the upstream domain of the frog promoter shows a stereo-specific requirement relative to the core promoter domain and dictates the face of the DNA helix on which transcription initiates, 140 bp away. In contrast, relative to the core promoter domain, initiation can occur on either side of the DNA helix. Furthermore, the striking observation that several frog half helical turn spacing change mutants are stronger templates with the mouse factors than the homologous mouse rDNA suggests that the polymerase I transcriptional machinery of even distantly related species is far more similar than generally envisioned.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Liu, A. Guo, B. Boukhgalter, K. Van Den Heuvel, M. Tripp, and L. Pape
Characterization of the fission yeast ribosomal DNA binding factor: components share homology with Upstream Activating Factor and with SWI/SNF subunits
Nucleic Acids Res., December 15, 2002; 30(24): 5347 - 5359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. R. Paule and R. J. White
SURVEY AND SUMMARY Transcription by RNA polymerases I and III
Nucleic Acids Res., March 15, 2000; 28(6): 1283 - 1298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. C. Tuan, W. Zhai, and L. Comai
Recruitment of TATA-Binding Protein-TAFI Complex SL1 to the Human Ribosomal DNA Promoter Is Mediated by the Carboxy-Terminal Activation Domain of Upstream Binding Factor (UBF) and Is Regulated by UBF Phosphorylation
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 1999; 19(4): 2872 - 2879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. B. Mougey, L. K. Pape, and B. Sollner-Webb
Virtually the Entire Xenopus laevis rDNA Multikilobase Intergenic Spacer Serves to Stimulate Polymerase I Transcription
J. Biol. Chem., October 25, 1996; 271(43): 27138 - 27145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
D A Keys, B S Lee, J A Dodd, T T Nguyen, L Vu, E Fantino, L M Burson, Y Nogi, and M Nomura
Multiprotein transcription factor UAF interacts with the upstream element of the yeast RNA polymerase I promoter and forms a stable preinitiation complex.
Genes & Dev., April 1, 1996; 10(7): 887 - 903.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
B McStay, M W Frazier, and R H Reeder
xUBF contains a novel dimerization domain essential for RNA polymerase I transcription.
Genes & Dev., November 1, 1991; 5(11): 1957 - 1968.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
B McStay and R H Reeder
An RNA polymerase I termination site can stimulate the adjacent ribosomal gene promoter by two distinct mechanisms in Xenopus laevis.
Genes & Dev., July 1, 1990; 4(7): 1240 - 1251.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
S P Bell, H M Jantzen, and R Tjian
Assembly of alternative multiprotein complexes directs rRNA promoter selectivity.
Genes & Dev., June 1, 1990; 4(6): 943 - 954.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genome Res. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genes Dev.