Genes and Development

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


GENES & DEVELOPMENT 22:1704-1716, 2008
©2008 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; ISSN 0890-9369/ $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zill, O. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rine, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zill, O. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rine, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Interspecies variation reveals a conserved repressor of {alpha}-specific genes in Saccharomyces yeasts

Oliver A. Zill and Jasper Rine1

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

The mating-type determination circuit in Saccharomyces yeast serves as a classic paradigm for the genetic control of cell type in all eukaryotes. Using comparative genetics, we discovered a central and conserved, yet previously undetected, component of this genetic circuit: active repression of {alpha}-specific genes in a cells. Upon inactivation of the SUM1 gene in Saccharomyces bayanus, a close relative of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a cells acquired mating characteristics of {alpha} cells and displayed autocrine activation of their mating response pathway. Sum1 protein bound to the promoters of {alpha}-specific genes, repressing their transcription. In contrast to the standard model, {alpha}1 was important but not required for {alpha}-specific gene activation and mating of {alpha} cells in the absence of Sum1. Neither Sum1 protein expression, nor its association with target promoters was mating-type-regulated. Thus, the {alpha}1/Mcm1 coactivators did not overcome repression by occluding Sum1 binding to DNA. Surprisingly, the mating-type regulatory function of Sum1 was conserved in S. cerevisiae. We suggest that a comprehensive understanding of some genetic pathways may be best attained through the expanded phenotypic space provided by study of those pathways in multiple related organisms.

[Keywords: Sum1; natural variation; cell-type determination; gene regulation]

Received December 5, 2007; revised version accepted April 11, 2008.


1 Corresponding author

E-MAIL jrine{at}berkeley.edu; FAX (510) 666-2768.

Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org.

Article is online at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.1640008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genome Res. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genes Dev.
Copyright © 2008 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.